Dr Benjamin Mceniery
This person does not currently hold a position at QUT.
Personal details
Keywords
bilski, innovation, intellectual property, intellectual property law, law, patent, patent law, physicality, property, property law
Research field
Law
Field of Research code, Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC), 2008
Qualifications
- Doctor of Philosophy (Queensland University of Technology)
- Master of Laws (Queensland University of Technology)
- Bachelor of Laws (Hons) (University of Queensland)
- Bachelor of Arts (Computer Science) (University of Queensland)
Teaching
- LWB486 Intellectual Property
- LWN099 Intellectual Property (Master of Laws)
- LWN147 Patent Law and Commercialisation (Master of Laws)
- LWN402 Patents and Biotechnological Inventions (Master of Laws)
- LWB407 Private International Law
Units previously taught
- LWB144 Laws and Global Perspectives
- LWB243 Property Law A
- LWB244 Property Law B
- LWB482 Internet Law
Publications
- McEniery, B., (2013). Addressing the impediments copyright imposes on the use of patent specifications and prior art documents to improve patent quality. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11(7), 643–671. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/63408
- McEniery, B., (2012). An empirical study of business method patent applications filed in Australia 2000-2009. Intellectual Property Forum, 2012(89), 22–34. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/53268
- McEniery, B., (2011). Is there a physicality requirement at Common Law? : A survey of the Pre-NRDC cases discussing Manufacture. Adelaide Law Review, 32(1), 109–143. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/45488
- McEniery, B., (2011). Physicality in Australian patent law. Deakin Law Review, 16(2), 461–494. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/48163
- McEniery, B., (2011). Physicality in the information age : A normative perspective on the patent eligibility of non-physical methods. Journal of Intellectual Property, 10, 106–167. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/41344
- McEniery, B., (2009). 'Storyline patents': are plots patentable? Melbourne University Law Review, 33(1), 292–319. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/28692
- McEniery, B., (2009). The federal circuit in Bilski: the machine-or-tranformation test. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 91(4), 253–271. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/32491
- McEniery, B., (2009). The patentability of non-physical inventions: lessons from the United States. Monash University Law Review, 35(2), 376–421. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/34453
- McEniery, B., (2007). Patents for Intangible Inventions in Australia After Grant v Commissioner of Patents (Part 1). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 13(2), 70–74. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/7006
- McEniery, B., (2007). Patents for Intangible Inventions in Australia After Grant v Commissioner of Patents (Part 2). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 13(3), 100–106. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/7444
QUT ePrints
For more publications by Benjamin, explore their research in QUT ePrints (our digital repository).