Casey Haining, QUT School of Law and Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Dementia is now the leading cause of death in Australia. However, those living with dementia are practically unable to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) for their dementia due to the eligibility criteria of current VAD laws that now exist everywhere in Australia except the Northern Territory.
Specifically, the requirements of VAD laws for people to both possess decision-making capacity (i.e., make decisions about themselves and communicate them) and be close to the end of life – usually with an expected death within six to twelve months – mean VAD for dementia is practically unavailable (in the absence of another qualifying condition).
In effect, by the time a person’s dementia is so advanced that they are at the end of life, they are unlikely to be able to possess the necessary decision-making capacity to request VAD for themselves. The NSW VAD law, meanwhile, specifically prohibits VAD for dementia.
Australia’s position compared to other countries
Australia’s position differs from that in other countries, such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada, where VAD for dementia is available. In the broadest sense this is approached in one of two ways – via a concurrent request or an advance request.
A concurrent request is where a person with decision-making capacity can request and access VAD while they have decision-making capacity, typically earlier in their dementia trajectory before they are at the end of life. In contrast, an advance request is where a person makes their preferences for VAD known while they still have decision-making capacity, which are then relied on later when the person can no longer make decisions for themselves.
Despite the possibility of VAD for dementia in other countries, its availability presents many practical and ethical challenges.
Current state of Australian evidence
Whether VAD should be available for dementia in Australia has received sustained attention, particularly in the popular media. There is also a limited but growing evidence base about attitudes towards this reform.
Discussions and research in Australia have not yet explored what a VAD framework and system might look like in Australia, particularly in light of the known challenges associated with permitting VAD for dementia.
We believe in the free flow of information
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
Latest stories
7 September 2026
Australia has a housing shortage. So why are Bathla and other home builders collapsing?
Thinner profit margins and higher risks are making housing less attractive for builders, compared to commercial and infrastructure projects, write Dr Lyndall Bryant and Dr Amanda Bull from the QUT Centre for Justice.
Read more of Australia has a housing shortage. So why are Bathla and other home builders collapsing?
1 September 2026
Google’s AI overviews reinforce some conspiracy theories – new research
Heard about the plane 'chemtrails' or 15-minute cities conspiracy theories? Google sure has. Experts from the QUT Digital Media Research Centre explain why stronger guardrails are needed for AI-generated search summaries.
Read more of Google’s AI overviews reinforce some conspiracy theories – new research
28 August 2026
The Northern Territory has just voted to legalise voluntary assisted dying. Here’s how it will work
Researchers from the Australian Centre for Health Law Research examine how new legislation passed in a conscience vote will apply in the NT.