Casey Haining, QUT School of Law and Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Dementia is now the leading cause of death in Australia. However, those living with dementia are practically unable to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) for their dementia due to the eligibility criteria of current VAD laws that now exist everywhere in Australia except the Northern Territory.
Specifically, the requirements of VAD laws for people to both possess decision-making capacity (i.e., make decisions about themselves and communicate them) and be close to the end of life – usually with an expected death within six to twelve months – mean VAD for dementia is practically unavailable (in the absence of another qualifying condition).
In effect, by the time a person’s dementia is so advanced that they are at the end of life, they are unlikely to be able to possess the necessary decision-making capacity to request VAD for themselves. The NSW VAD law, meanwhile, specifically prohibits VAD for dementia.
Australia’s position compared to other countries
Australia’s position differs from that in other countries, such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada, where VAD for dementia is available. In the broadest sense this is approached in one of two ways – via a concurrent request or an advance request.
A concurrent request is where a person with decision-making capacity can request and access VAD while they have decision-making capacity, typically earlier in their dementia trajectory before they are at the end of life. In contrast, an advance request is where a person makes their preferences for VAD known while they still have decision-making capacity, which are then relied on later when the person can no longer make decisions for themselves.
Despite the possibility of VAD for dementia in other countries, its availability presents many practical and ethical challenges.
Current state of Australian evidence
Whether VAD should be available for dementia in Australia has received sustained attention, particularly in the popular media. There is also a limited but growing evidence base about attitudes towards this reform.
Discussions and research in Australia have not yet explored what a VAD framework and system might look like in Australia, particularly in light of the known challenges associated with permitting VAD for dementia.
We believe in the free flow of information
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
Latest stories
29 July 2026
Millions of Aussie roofs are now power stations. Who will coordinate them all?
Australia has become a world leader in rooftop solar. But as more households add batteries and electric vehicles, PhD student Komeil Moghaddasi and Professor Raja Jurdak say the real challenge is no longer generating clean energy but redesigning the grid.
Read more of Millions of Aussie roofs are now power stations. Who will coordinate them all?
28 July 2026
The ban on telehealth in voluntary assisted dying doesn’t stack up. Here’s why it should be scrapped
Telehealth is often an integral part of modern health care but health practitioners risk prosecution for using it in voluntary assisted dying. Distinguished Professor Ben White, Dr Eliana Close, and Dr Katrine Del Villar argue the ban should be repealed.
8 July 2026
Female graduates are earning less than their male peers. What might be causing the gap?
A survey showed the annual median full-time graduate salary for women was $3,700 less than men’s. Research suggests gender bias might be at play, writes Associate Professor Leonora Risse.
Read more of Female graduates are earning less than their male peers. What might be causing the gap?