Casey Haining, QUT School of Law and Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Dementia is now the leading cause of death in Australia. However, those living with dementia are practically unable to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) for their dementia due to the eligibility criteria of current VAD laws that now exist everywhere in Australia except the Northern Territory.
Specifically, the requirements of VAD laws for people to both possess decision-making capacity (i.e., make decisions about themselves and communicate them) and be close to the end of life – usually with an expected death within six to twelve months – mean VAD for dementia is practically unavailable (in the absence of another qualifying condition).
In effect, by the time a person’s dementia is so advanced that they are at the end of life, they are unlikely to be able to possess the necessary decision-making capacity to request VAD for themselves. The NSW VAD law, meanwhile, specifically prohibits VAD for dementia.
Australia’s position compared to other countries
Australia’s position differs from that in other countries, such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada, where VAD for dementia is available. In the broadest sense this is approached in one of two ways – via a concurrent request or an advance request.
A concurrent request is where a person with decision-making capacity can request and access VAD while they have decision-making capacity, typically earlier in their dementia trajectory before they are at the end of life. In contrast, an advance request is where a person makes their preferences for VAD known while they still have decision-making capacity, which are then relied on later when the person can no longer make decisions for themselves.
Despite the possibility of VAD for dementia in other countries, its availability presents many practical and ethical challenges.
Current state of Australian evidence
Whether VAD should be available for dementia in Australia has received sustained attention, particularly in the popular media. There is also a limited but growing evidence base about attitudes towards this reform.
Discussions and research in Australia have not yet explored what a VAD framework and system might look like in Australia, particularly in light of the known challenges associated with permitting VAD for dementia.
We believe in the free flow of information
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
Latest stories
16 October 2026
Some Australian research funding is now a lottery. And that’s actually good news
Professor Adrian Barnett from QUT and Professor Philip Clarke from The University of Melbourne explain why leaving some funding decisions up to luck can save everybody time and effort – and help understand what the funding actually does.
Read more of Some Australian research funding is now a lottery. And that’s actually good news
7 October 2026
It’s true, Australia won’t ban ‘sock puppet’ accounts on social media. Here’s why
Professor Daniel Angus and Associate Professor Timothy Graham from the QUT Digital Media Research Centre explain how Australia's proposed Digital Duty of Care bill will protect university researchers using fictitious accounts for online safety research.
Read more of It’s true, Australia won’t ban ‘sock puppet’ accounts on social media. Here’s why
25 September 2026
An AI model has found a new ‘CRISPR‑like’ biological system. Here’s what it means for science
AI agents may become another tool for researchers and even transform biological research, but there are also questions around how the technology can be kept safe, writes Associate Professor Dimitri Perrin, Co-Director of the QUT Centre for Data Science.